Donna's book shows that IPCC is A TOTAL HOAX.

1. It does NOT use only peer reviewed literature.

2. It is populated by tens of green fanatics such as members and office bearers of the World Wildlife Fund.

3. Some of its lead authors have received their PhDs 16 years AFTER writing reports for IPCC, as if there is a scarcity of professors with 40 years of expertise in the relevant science.

4. NO ONE knows how it selects its authors. In addition to appointing ACTUAL SPOKESPERSONS of WWF, etc., it appoints people on the basis of their nationality and gender, NOT on the basis of expertise.

5. It does NOT prevent lead authors from reviewing their own publications for IPCC.

6. It is hands-in-glove with journal editors and as many as 16 out 20 articles were extracted by its lead authors from a particular issue of a journal, with these authors also being editors of that journal. This is call "planting" data in the world of crime.

7. It does NOT allow its reviewers to question data from unpublished papers that are being used (since these papers support the preconceived biases of IPCC lead authors)

And so on. One fraud after another. One violation of INTEGRITY after another. Relentless attempt to MISLEAD.

The GREATEST HOAX was the hockey stick which violated not only its own 1990 report but also has been repeated FALSIFIED by peer reviewed studies.

In particular, so-called "scientists" like James Hansen and Michael Mann have been reportedly FALSIFYING DATA. I can do no better than to refer you this blog post which describes the RACKET in great detail.

If after this, anyone tells me that "IPCC" says this or says that, I'm going to have to really get annoyed.

Please, for God's sake, start THINKING FOR YOURSELF.

You call yourself educated? Then READ and find out the truth for yourself.

Addendum

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/yet-another-paper-mwp-warmer-than.html

Related posts:

1. Now compare the language of a REAL scientist (Richard Feynman) to this joker’s – Michael Mann
2. The Himalayan blunder of the world’s top Government “scientists” (IPCC) – in gory detail
3. Thirty per cent of IPCC citations are NOT peer-reviewed
4. Now John Quiggin says that the world’s top scientists are stupid! This is getting absurd.
5. Are scientists entitled to secrecy?
6. James Lovelock is an HONEST man. I tip my hat to him.
7. Matt Ridley smashes the pretense of knowledge of “experts” (including “climate scientists”)
8. IPCC reports = toilet paper?
9. If you care about your future, please buy and read The Delinquent Teenager by Donna Laframboise
10. Donna Laframbroise puts the final nail in IPCC’s coffin