This speaks for itself:

during the recent Anna Hazare agitation in Delhi, the media hyped the event as a solution to the problem of corruption. 
 
The Jan Lokpal Bill 2011 defines an act of corruption as punishable under Chapter IX of the Indian Penal Code or under the Prevention of Corruption Act vide Section 2(e). Section 6(a) of the bill says the Lokpal will exercise superintendence over investigation of acts of corruption, and section 6(c) empowers the Lokpal to punish acts of corruption after giving a hearing. Section 6(e) authorises the Lokpal to initiate prosecution, and section 6(f) authorises him to ensure proper prosecution. Section 6(i)(j) authorises him to receive complaints.
 
Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act defines a public servant very widely. It includes not only government servants but also a host of other categories, such as employees of a local body, judges, certain office-bearers of some cooperative societies, officials of Service Commission or Board, and vice chancellors and teachers in universities.
 
As pointed out in ‘Recreating Frankenstein’s monster’, there are about 55 lakh government employees (13 lakh in the Railways alone). There will be several lakhs more in other categories coming under the definition of public servant according to the Prevention of Corruption Act. Obviously, one person cannot supervise and decide on presumably millions of complaints pouring in against them. Hence, thousands of Lokpals, maybe 50,000 or more, will have to be appointed. They will have to be given salaries, offices, staff, etc. Considering the low level of morality prevailing in India, we can be fairly certain that most of them will become blackmailers. It will create a parallel bureaucracy, which in one stroke will double the corruption in the country. And who will guard these Praetorian Guards? A body of Super Lokpals?
 
All this was not rationally analysed. Instead, the hysterical mob that gathered in Jantar Mantar and Ramlila grounds in Delhi thought that corruption would be ended by shouting “Bharat Mata ki Jai” and “Inquilab Zindabad”.
 
It is time Indians woke up to all this. [Source]
I may disagree with some of the injudicious comments of former Supreme Court Justice Mr. Katju, but he does not mince words about the fact the Lokpal is NO WAY TO REMOVE CORRUPTION.
 
Hats off to him for daring to speak the truth in the environment of demagoguery led by Anna Hazare and his group of half-baked thinkers.
 
Once again, a link to FTI's position on the Lokpal bill. Please circulate it widely, including to Mr. Katju who might be (I'm not sure) fit to become an FTI member.

If you found this post useful, then consider subscribing to my blog by email:

Breaking Free of Nehru

Join the Freedom Team of India or become a Freedom Partner.

email
Google
Print Friendly
Tagged with:
 

3 Responses to “Katju may be injudicious in the way he speaks, but he has a point”

  1. Katju may be injudicious in the way he speaks, but he has a point http://t.co/hqqHHCiW #politics #lokpalbill

  2. Katju may be injudicious in the way he speaks, but he has a point http://t.co/WEG8LJP4

  3. Mithun Dutta says:

    Katju may be injudicious in the way he speaks, but he has a point http://t.co/hqqHHCiW #politics #lokpalbill

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.



p-4j9aGt2RSyXeB