Leaving aside the question of biased referencing of the "science" by IPCC (its main writers have been citing each other, like a small club), it turns out that 30.15 per cent of IPCC references were to 'grey literature' (things like this blog). [Source]
I know there are still a few die-hards who refuse to admit that:
(a) IPCC is a close-knit POLITICAL coterie that cherry picks papers, lies and fudges at every step;
(b) there is NO CONSENSUS among "97 per cent" of "climate scientists" about IPCC results (most oppose its wild conclusions);
(c) many IPCC authors have no academic qualifications;
(d) most IPCC authors do not understand the basics of statistics;
(e) NONE of IPCC's underlying models have tracked reality – thus disproving the hyped-up claims of the IPCC; and
(f) 30 per cent of IPCC citations were from non-peer reviewed publications.
I did call IPCC reports toilet paper in the past. Now I'm going to have to call this entire organisation a fraud – a MEGA FRAUD on mankind.
Let IPCC be dissolved IMMEDIATELY.
If you found this post useful, then consider subscribing to my blog by email: