Apparently Arun Jaitley has today raised the issue of electoral funding. I can't find details, but in the meanwhile I came across the following news report of 2009 (source) which has some truly absurd comments by our "policy makers" and shows why India is so ill-served by its incompetent leaders (Gopalswami is an exception).

State funding of elections is not panacea for all ills facing the electoral system, experts, including Election Commissioner S Y Quraishi, said on Saturday. 

"Public funding of elections is not the solution. Who will give guarantee that it will stop the flow of black money," Quraishi said at a seminar on electoral reforms, organised by Foundation for Advanced Management of Elections. 
 
He, however, said ceiling for spending in the elections could be increased from the present level of Rs 25 lakh per candidate in the Lok Sabha polls. 
 
"We can rationalise the ceiling. The ceiling level can be increased," he said. 
 
Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said that the real threat to the electoral process is coming from the money power. 
 
"State funding is no answer. It will not stop the huge expenditure," he said. 
 
However, former Chief Election Commissioner N Gopalswami favoured state funding as the best possible solution to the issue of flow of illegal money into the electoral system. 
 
"Money, gifts, jewellery and other things are distributed by candidates during election campaign to get votes. State funding is the best answer to stop such practice," he said. 
So what's wrong with all this?
 
First, we don't want ANY ceiling. That will be a disaster as it will create incentives to cheat. We don't want anyone to be afraid of speaking the truth. Let people spend whatever they wish. Let them disclose it. If even a PAISA is not disclosed, they would lose their election (if they have won). No compromise on accountability. [Also see this blog post of mine]
 
Second, we don't want any ADVANCE payment. Let political parties and candidate borrow money, if they wish, but what we want is POST-FACTO payment. The purpose of state funding is NOT to stop black money flows (that is one of its purposes, but an incidental one), but to ALLOW good people to contest elections.
 
By funding me Rs.20 per valid vote, I can spend a bit of my money and contest, with the hope of at least recovering part of it. That is a GREAT INCENTIVE for good people to contest elections.
 
In brief, we want this:
 
1. State funding of elections (Rs. 20 per valid vote cast)

2. Remove all limits to electoral funding

3. Ensure the MOST RIGOROUS disclosure requirements for political donations – if even ONE paisa is not properly disclosed, the candidate will lose his election even if he gets the most votes.

In addition we want this:
4. Pay the politicians VERY WELL (and remove all their perks)
 
If Anna Hazare repeats these last four points, I'll begin to believe that he is genuine about his desire to remove corruption. Till he does that this whole IAC things sounds to me like a big drama of no consequence to India's future. 

If you found this post useful, then consider subscribing to my blog by email:

Breaking Free of Nehru

Join the Freedom Team of India or become a Freedom Partner.

email
Google
Print Friendly
Tagged with:
 

3 Responses to “State funding of elections on the agenda? A great opportunity to fix corruption at it source”

  1. State funding of elections on the agenda? A great opportunity to fix corruption at it source… http://t.co/jSCy1GS

  2. State funding of elections on the agenda? A great opportunity to fix corruption at it source http://t.co/LaO7LBn

  3. vishal says:

    @tavleen_singh state funding for 'valid votes' will be gamechanger http://t.co/SDJruuh

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.



p-4j9aGt2RSyXeB