This (below) is the latest Shanghai rankings of universities in relation to economics.
I'm glad to note that my alma mater (USC) is at least in the top 40, although an obscure Candian university has done better. However, it was disappointing to note that although Hong Kong and China (and Israel, if you consider it to be Asian) have managed to find a place in this top 100 list, India does not figure. (Even Australia, I notice, is very poorly placed in its economics education.)
For a country the size of India to have such DEPLORABLE economics education is a shame of unbelievable magnitude. No society can run its policy well if it doesn't pay importance to economics education.
Is this lack of good economics education the reason why most Indians find it so hard to understand the basic economics I've introduced in chapter 4 of BFN which explains why the laws of India MANDATE that only the corrupt should enter politics?
It often seems to me to be next to impossible to explain to Indians that ECONOMICS RULES THE WORLD. And that they MUST understand the world's best economists like Adam Smith and F.A. Hayek if they want a genuinely prosperous nation. (At the least understand me! – make sure you read and fully understand BFN.).
If Indians won't try to understand economics and economic incentives, then PLEASE forget about good policy, and definitely forget about the elimination of corruption. This drama of "fighting" corruption that is going on in India is such a big joke.
(Btw, here's a list of good Indian economists – noting that most of them teach non-Indians, just like I provide economic policy advice to non-Indians for a living, since India won't listen to me)
| World Rank |
Institution | Country | Total Score |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
![]() |
100.0
|
|
||
|
2
|
![]() |
91.2
|
|
||
|
3
|
![]() |
83.8
|
|
||
|
4
|
![]() |
77.7
|
|
||
|
5
|
![]() |
77.0
|
|
||
|
6
|
![]() |
76.2
|
|
||
|
7
|
![]() |
73.5
|
|
||
|
8
|
![]() |
71.7
|
|
||
|
9
|
![]() |
65.2
|
|
||
|
10
|
![]() |
64.4
|
|
||
|
11
|
![]() |
62.5
|
|
||
|
12
|
![]() |
60.3
|
|
||
|
13
|
![]() |
59.6
|
|
||
|
14
|
![]() |
58.9
|
|
||
|
15
|
![]() |
58.4
|
|
||
|
16
|
![]() |
58.2
|
|
||
|
17
|
![]() |
54.3
|
|
||
|
18
|
![]() |
53.9
|
|
||
|
19
|
![]() |
53.4
|
|
||
|
20
|
![]() |
52.9
|
|
||
|
21
|
![]() |
52.3
|
|
||
|
22
|
![]() |
52.0
|
|
||
|
23
|
![]() |
51.6
|
|
||
|
24
|
![]() |
50.1
|
|
||
|
25
|
![]() |
49.9
|
|
||
|
26
|
![]() |
48.6
|
|
||
|
27
|
![]() |
48.3
|
|
||
|
28
|
![]() |
47.7
|
|
||
|
29
|
![]() |
47.4
|
|
||
|
30
|
![]() |
46.0
|
|
||
|
31
|
![]() |
45.9
|
|
||
|
32
|
![]() |
45.8
|
|
||
|
33
|
![]() |
45.7
|
|
||
|
34
|
![]() |
45.5
|
|
||
|
35
|
![]() |
45.3
|
|
||
|
36
|
![]() |
44.6
|
|
||
|
36
|
![]() |
44.6
|
|
||
|
38
|
![]() |
44.3
|
|
||
|
39
|
![]() |
44.2
|
|
||
|
40
|
![]() |
43.5
|
|
||
|
40
|
![]() |
43.5
|
|
||
|
40
|
![]() |
43.5
|
|
||
|
43
|
![]() |
43.4
|
|
||
|
44
|
![]() |
43.3
|
|
||
|
45
|
![]() |
42.4
|
|
||
|
45
|
![]() |
42.4
|
|
||
|
47
|
![]() |
41.9
|
|
||
|
47
|
![]() |
41.9
|
|
||
|
49
|
![]() |
41.8
|
|
||
|
50
|
![]() |
41.5
|
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
51-75
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
76-100
|
![]() |
|
0.0
|
||
|
* Institutions within the same rank range are listed alphabetically.
|
|||||
var menu=new menu.dd();
menu.init("menu","menuhover");
If you found this post useful, then consider subscribing to my blog by email:
Join the Freedom Team of India or become a Freedom Partner.
Related posts:
- The sad state of economics today (Greg Manikew’s mumbo jumbo)
- Free education about liberty and economics – at the Liberty Academy
- India’s education system is its DNA: children are moulded into dictaphones
- Visual proof that policy has real impacts: You can never outsmart the laws of economics
- A liberal policy position on higher education
- Topsy turvy higher education system in India
- Can I see Arvind Kejriwal’s theory of state (or of Anna Hazare), please?
- Himachal and Tamil Nadu bravely face the truth about their rotten education system
- So what should be the position of the state re: fast unto death?
- Arvind Kejriwal’s theory of the state #1


















Sanjiv,
I could not resist responding to this one, as the irony cannot be anymore stark than what is signified by the current state of that nation which hogs a lion's share of 'glory' in rankings for quality of economics education.
How much ever the dodos of Harvard and Stanford will bury their heads in the sand with their denials and their continued evangelism of supply-side voodoo economics and Keynesian mish-mash, the economic ground reality is of US slowly but surely heading towards Great Depression 2.0, already having suffered the ignominy of its sovereign rating being downgraded
Of what avail are these rankings of economic institutes, when only a handful of economists of the US and the western world have really understood the true import of the economic avalanche that is heading their way.
India for all its pathetic rankings in economics education did produce a successful and level-headed central banker in Dr. YV Reddy at a time when the likes of Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke are fast heading for enduring infamy and disgrace in the Mecca of economics and finance. I dont need spend my time pillorying these two hand-maidens of the wall street syndicate since that job is done with far greater finesse by finance blogosphere of the US
The great many souls of Havard, Stanford or Yale were firm in their belief and conviction that US was on the path of a 'Goldilocks economy' even as late as 2007, when the stresses in the economy were obvious to even less celebrated analysts and journalists.
While I don't claim to have anything other than interest in macro-economics, I consider my understanding of the economic situation of the developed world to be much better than these decorated students and faculty of these institutes.
The following links contain my thoughts on the economic malaise of the US and the west, written long before the current resumption of the downtrend which is pulling Europe along with the US
http://variedessays.blogspot.com/2010/07/moralistic-interpretation-of-us.html
http://globalinvestinghorizons.blogspot.com/2010/03/recession-is-it-really-in-mind-and-what.html
Despite my being just a student of macroeconomics and pursuing this as a hobby along with sociology, I feel I am not very much off the mark on my assessment of economic ground reality as these articles by the few truly knowledgeable economists like Nouriel Roubini, Simon Johnson, Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman (though not so much as the other three) below will bear out
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/marx-was-right-capitalism-is-on-a-self-destructive-path-nouriel-roubini/23-08.html
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/dangerous-and-diseased-the-us-and-europes-grand-debacle/16-08.html
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/elitist-nonsense-shattered-by-paul-krugman.29-07.html
http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/anarchy-in-the-uk-the-socio-economic-factors-behind-the-london-riots.19-08.html
How much ever the neo-liberals will swear by Hayek and Adam Smith, the fate of current state capitalism seems quite gloomy and looks like Karl Marx is going to have the laughs for the next few years
Ranganath, I'm unable to place your economic preferences in the right slot and don't have (regrettably) time to read your references.
I AGREE with you that the Keynesians have brought USA to its knees.
I DISAGREE that capitalism in dead in USA. You forget the resurgence of freedom that is coming in from the grassroots. Also known as the Tea Party.